The connections
Who, what, and how certain.
The drawing below shows what connects to what here: the person, the label, the radio, the library catalogue, the sources. Every line between two points is a claim — and beneath the drawing each one says what it rests on.
Graph
Provenance- documented relation
- recorded but not linked
- open question — no
sameAsstatement
The name variant “Pierre Stephan” stays as a node of its own, even though it is now confirmed as denoting the same person. Letting it disappear would hide that the work is published under two spellings — and that is exactly what has to stay findable. Between the catalogue and the releases, one match is waiting on an owner decision.
The relations as text
10 edges- operates
Pierre (Bob) Stephan → Electri_C_ity Studios
- catalogued in
Pierre (Bob) Stephan → the DNB catalogue (367 records)
- publishes
Electri_C_ity Studios → 22 recorded titles
- broadcasts
Electri_C_ity Studios → a 24/7 radio operation
- develops
Electri_C_ity Studios → 9 technology projects, 4 of them with a repository
- evidenced by
The network’s statements → 59 registered sources
- evidenced identical to
Catalogue records → 12 releases
- possibly identical to
Catalogue records → 1 release
open - is
Pierre (Bob) Stephan → “Pierre Stephan” (second form of the name)
- sameAs
Pierre (Bob) Stephan → 4 profile
What is not here. Of 59 recorded sources, 8 carry a
sameAs statement: the project’s own domains, the platform profiles whose operator identity was checked against them, and the account that holds the work. All the rest stay links without a claim of identity — among them the professional networks, because two different LinkedIn profiles exist under this spelling of the name. A matching name finds other people too.